Garamendi v. Superior National Insurance
(California Court of Appeals, 2nd District, Oct. 26, 2005)(Unpublished)
Ruling: At issue was the trial court decision denying the insureds’ proof of claim for paid time-off benefits as a first priority claim under Insurance Code 茂驴陆1033(a)(1). The court held that a proof of paid time-off benefits is properly disallowed, where the claimant remanded the employee of the insurance holding company after being terminated by the Commissioner of Insurance.
Information compiled by Goldberg Segalla. Web site:
www.goldbergsegalla.com.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Jury Awards 78-Year-Old Victim $56 Million for Crash Caused by Amazon Delivery Driver 
Cost of a Data Breach Reaches Record $5 Million on Average 
Record-Low Danube Water Levels Leave Boats Beached, Reveal Decades-Old Shipwrecks 
Company at Center of Cyclospora Outbreak Complained to White House, Source Says From This Issue
