Be careful with that thing. It could put someone’s eye out.
That’s the upshot from a Sussex County, Delaware, judge’s ruling that State Farm doesn’t have to indemnify a policyholder in a paintball injury lawsuit.
The June 7 ruling involves an incident in which a boy fired a paintball gun at a group of kids, hitting one of them in the eye and causing a severe injury.
The victim’s family sued the shooter’s family, which sought coverage under their homeowner’s policy.
The judge agreed with State Farm that it is not liable because the policy includes a provision excluding coverage for bodily injury or property damage that is either expected or intended by the insured. He said the shooter intentionally fired the paintball at the other kids knowing that someone could get hurt.
Topics Lawsuits Legislation
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Florida’s Unemployment Rate Is Surging Even as High-Profile Companies Move In 
A Super Yacht Armada Came to Miami, Leaving a Marine Graveyard in Its Wake 
Mamdani Delivers Rent Freeze in Milestone for New York City Tenants 
PE-Backed Insurance Broker Hub International Files Confidentially for US IPO 
